Permission to reprint is granted in whole or part with attribution to: Liberty Matters News Service. Contact us at 1-800-847-0227 or lm@libertymatters.org

 

Liberty Matters

March 2 , 2009

No Way Out of Perpetual Easement for ND Farmer

Alvin Peterson, the 78 year-old retired North Dakota farmer who has waged a forty-year battle with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service over easements protecting potholes on his farm, was fined $10,000 and slapped with a five-year probation sentence in federal court February 24.  This is the second time in four years that Alvin has been found guilty of destroying government property.  Peterson maintains that Fish and Wildlife agents misled his ailing father into signing the perpetual conservation easements on the farm that he inherited in 1974.  He was convicted of similar offenses in 2004, a conviction he appealed to District Court and then to the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals, twice.  Each time, the decision of the Magistrate Court was upheld.  He refused to pay the fines levied in the first case because, he said, “that would be an admission of guilt.”  Alvin’s lawyer Tami Norgard told the court “he’s of the view that there is no easement in the first place and he feels very strongly about that.”  In addition to the fine and probation, Peterson was ordered to pay for the government’s expenses to restore the wetlands to their previous condition.  U.S. Attorney Cameron Hayden wanted a10-year probation imposed, evidently to make up for the aggravation factor.  Peterson “egregiously violated” the easement terms for the second time and wants to end the constant litigation which has caused “a waste of tremendous court resources.”  Norgard said she and her client are considering an appeal. 

Man gets $10,000 fine for draining wetland

CBD Establishes Climate Law Center

The Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) has announced the establishment of “The Climate Law Institute” to litigate against fossil fuel use and make new state and federal laws to address the issues the group thinks is crucial to the survival of the planet.  The new institute, appropriately located in San Francisco, has $17 million in start-up money provided by the Sandler Foundation, the Richard and Rhoda Goldman Fund, and several others.  “Global warming is the greatest challenge humanity has ever faced,” said Kieran Suckling, executive director of CBD.   “The planet cannot afford a single new coal-fired plant,” he continued, “it can’t even afford existing coal plants.”  He says by working with their partners in government and the environmentalists, they plan to eliminate coal energy post haste.  “Our lives depend on it,” he states.  The institute will be headed by attorney Kassie Siegel, current director of CBD’s Climate, Air and Energy division.  Siegel is charged with working to protect biodiversity, oceans, public lands and urban wildlands.  Siegel was responsible for suing to protect the polar bear from extinction due to “global warming.”  She was also responsible for tightening federal fuel-economy standards, resulting in higher costs to California drivers.  Some of the goals of the institute include: establish new state and federal environmental laws and policies to rein in global warming; prevent construction of new coal-fired plants and phase out existing ones; and, prevent the creation of oil-shale or tar sands energy sector and reverse the deadly process of ocean acidification (whatever that means).  “Climate change is a crisis we don’t need and can’t afford,” said Climate Law Institute advisory board member Patrick Parenteau, professor of law at the Vermont Law School.

Center for Biological Diversity Declares Legal War on Global Warming

ND Wary of Non-Profit Land Use Groups

Clois Hetletved had his mother’s farm on the market for over a year before he received an offer to his liking – from Ducks Unlimited (DU).  Proceeds from the sale were to be used to pay for his 87 year-old mother’s care in a Bismark retirement home.  But before the sale could be finalized, it had to be approved by the Natural Areas Acquisition Advisory Committee, an eight-member panel of agriculture and conservation representatives.  North Dakota has fiercely protected private property in the state for over a century, beginning with anti-corporate farming laws enacted in the 1930s.  Non-profits were originally labeled corporate entities and were not allowed to own land until the mid-1980s, when the state legislature voted to allow some of those groups to buy land.  But first, the sale must be approved by the Advisory Committee.  The Hetletved/DU deal didn’t make the cut.  The Advisory Board voted 6-2 against the deal, citing a lack of public benefit.  The Kidder County Commissioners voted 2-1 against it.  Governor Hoeven followed the Committee’s recommendation and denied DU’s application to purchase on February 12.  Brian Kramer, North Dakota Farm Bureau director explained, “Most of the time these folks [non-profits] come in and try to say there’s something new or unique or whatever about this land purchase…In our minds, they’re just looking to buy up more land and take it out of production.”  Jim Ringleman, DU’s director of conservation for the Dakotas and Montana, was disappointed by the decision.  However, he recognizes that DU’s stated intention to establish a permanent easement on the land through the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service was a big factor in the denial.  North Dakota is the only state in the U.S. that prohibits selling perpetual easements.  State law limits easement agreements to no longer than 99 years.  The ND state Senate voted overwhelmingly last week to uphold that ban.

N.D. law complicates nonprofit land purchases

Arizona Rancher Not Guilty of Civil Rights Violation

A federal jury on February 17, concluded that Arizona rancher Roger Barnett did not violate the civil rights of illegal aliens he caught trespassing on his property.  Sixteen illegal aliens, aided by the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF), brought suit against Roger Barnett and his wife and brother for engaging in a conspiracy to deprive plaintiffs of their civil rights.  The suit stems from a March 7, 2004 incident, in which Mr. Barnett came across a large group of people who were hiding in the underbrush.  As a precautionary measure, Barnett held them at gunpoint until he determined they were not armed.  He then called the Border Patrol who arrived and took them into custody.  His property has been a major thoroughfare for illegal immigrants since 1998.  The illegals have killed his calves, destroyed fences, stolen trucks and broken into his home.  The lawsuit asked for damages of $32 million; $2 million for each plaintiff.  U.S. District Judge John M. Roll, threw out the “conspiracy” charge and the jury disposed of false imprisonment and battery charges.  They did, however, award plaintiffs $77,000 in punitive and actual damages on claims of assault and infliction of emotion distress.  One of the plaintiffs, Gerardo Gonzalez, was a convicted felon who had been deported in 1993 for possession of a controlled substance with the intent to sell.  David Urias, one of the nine MALDEF attorneys, said they were disappointed with the verdict, “[B]ut I think overall this was a victory for the plaintiffs.”  David Hardy, Barnett’s attorney says they plan an appeal.  Anyone wishing to contribute to Mr. Barnett’s Legal Defense Fund may do so by sending contributions to:  Barnett Legal Defense Fund, 1498 E. Fey Blvd, Sierra Vista, AZ 85635, or call 1-800-722-2303 at Barnett Towing Service for credit card donations.

Mixed verdict over migrants' run-in with rancher

Home

Send mail to the webmaster with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright © 2009 Liberty Matters